Lactivism and Feminism in the United States Context (Blog Post 4)

Research Question:

To what extent can lactivism be considered feminism? How does the dynamic of lactivist extremists interact with current feminist ideals in the United States and what insight does this provide of the greater lactivist movement?

Thesis Moment:

Breastfeeding exists as the intimate exchange between mother and child, providing nutritional and immune system benefits thus laying the groundwork for the infant to “achieve optimal growth, development, and health” (WHO 1). Despite this universality, huge cultural and environmental variations exist. Thus, women face this individual decision against a complex cultural background complete with a colorful history tinged with malicious corporate greed and corresponding misuse of authority. However, this situation further complicates as extremists on conflicting sides of lactivism, the activism of lactation, have polarized the issue. One extreme promotes breastfeeding at all costs while the other end urges individuals to heavily consider the power of choice in this decision. While these groups possess wildly different perspectives, both exist to protect mothers and children and both claim a connection to feminism. Feminism itself can be described as “the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes”. The divergence of lactivism in the United States context presents a fascinating dilemma- is lactivism feminism? While both sides possess elements of the feminist movement, the presence of extremists makes it so neither side can make such a claim to feminism. Lactivists who exclusively promote breastfeeding and shame mothers who cannot or choose not to participate fall short of feminist ideals just as the reactionary movement that shames the initial movement and perhaps obliviously reinforces choice.

Road Map:

Before I begin my analysis of the extremists present in lactivism and ties to feminism, I will define all of these terms along with cultural and historical context. Given the breadth of this paper, my argument will be based in the United States, while including a few global examples as relevant to the 1970s lactivism efforts and conditions where both extremes in the situation fail. Next, elements of the dichotomy of the movement shall be evaluated based on how feminist ideals are upheld or violated in the American context. Feminism in the United States itself can manifest as a segmented movement, and I will thus focus on feminism as an overarching idea as opposed to the branching out that has occurred, given the scope of the paper. While I do not plan on denouncing a lactivist extreme nor solely promoting another, I believe that such a comparison and evaluation can provide support for my argument that shaming tactics should take a backseat to encouragement and support within the breastfeeding decision.



3 thoughts on “Lactivism and Feminism in the United States Context (Blog Post 4)”

  1. This is such an awesome topic (as I have said 1000 times)! As you mention, it is essential that you define feminism in order to create that comparison – what do you imagine those values will be? My worry is that they/the entire movement will be very difficult to define (I’m having the same problem with my paper). In addition to corporate greed, will you include government interference in the lactivist movement, perhaps laws that ban public breastfeeding?

    Good luck! It’s going to be an awesome paper! 🙂


  2. I really like your current topic and the way you’re approaching it! You noted in your outline that you will touch upon some global examples where both lactivist standpoints fail. I was wondering if you were planning to discuss the standpoint of the people native to the terrains where these examples take place. Does lactivism as a movement exist there at all? If it does, it seems like the native lactivists could also provide some useful insight.


  3. Like Amit said, I worry that the entire movement of lactivism will be hard to define. Do you plan to examine one side and determine if that is feminist (with no regard to the other side)? Or are you going to say that one side is more feminist than the other side?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s